December 2009

U.S. oversight panel chief: TARP not a "slush fund"

WASHINGTON (Reuters) โ€“
The Treasury must seek Congressional approval if it wants to funnel some of its $700 billion bailout fund to jobs programs that do not involve financial services firms as intermediaries, a key overseer said on Wednesday.

Elizabeth Warren, chairman of the Congressional Oversight Panel, told CNBC television that the Obama administration cannot simply spend TARP funds "in a jobs program somewhere else." The panel earlier on Wednesday released a report criticizing TARP for failing to adequately address the home foreclosure crisis and the contraction in credit in the U.S. economy.

"It is not simply a slush fund that can be used on anything anyone wants to do, no matter how worthy," Warren said of TARP.

(Reporting by David Lawder; Editing by Theodore d'Afflisio)

Clean Washing Machine

Because water usually had to be heated on a fire for washing, the warm soapy water was precious and would be reused over and over, first to wash the least soiled clothing, then to wash progressively dirtier clothing. The load of soaking wet clothing would be removed, and another load of dirty clothes added to the machine. While the earliest machines were constructed entirely from wood, later machines made of metal permitted a fire to burn below the washtub, to keep the water warm throughout the day's washing.

What is now referred to as an automatic washer was at one time referred to as a washer/extractor, which combines the features of these two devices into a single machine, plus also includes the ability to fill and drain water by itself. It is possible to take this a step further, to also merge the automatic washing machine and clothes dryer into a single device, but this is generally uncommon because the drying process tends to use much more energy than using two separate devices; a combined washer/dryer not only must dry the clothing, but also need to dry out the wash chamber itself.

Clean Washing Machine

IGNORE THE PUBLICITY HOUNDS AND GET BACK TO WORK (Cynthia Tucker)

Without regrets, the social secretary declined the invitation. Desiree Rogers skipped last week's congressional hearing to determine exactly who's to blame for the blemish that marred the first couple's big dinner party -- the entry of two interlopers. The guests of honor, the gate-crashing Tareq and Michaele Salahi, also declined to attend.

Official Washington is still all a-twitter over a celebrity-seeking Virginia couple's successful entry -- sans invitation, apparently -- into a high-security, invitation-only state dinner at the White House just before Thanksgiving. Investigations are in progress; a hearing was held; the Salahis continue to extend their 15 minutes of fame.

You'd think that with two wars, staggering debt and soaring unemployment, Congress would have weightier matters to explore. But the inside-the-Beltway milieu has its own rules, procedures and protocols. Somebody would have to be slow-roasted on a public spit for the security breach; no public official worth his salt could resist the opportunity to burnish his credentials while tarnishing those of his opponents.

So there was U.S. Rep. Bennie Thompson, head of the House Homeland Security Committee, mightily annoyed that the Salahis refused to appear before his panel on Thursday. He threatened to issue a subpoena and to hold them in contempt of Congress should they refuse to honor it. "We must dissect every fact," he declared.

Never mind that the Salahis are already the subject of an official investigation by the Secret Service. Thompson wants to borrow a couple of their 15 minutes.

Upping the ante on absurdity, U.S. Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., threatened to subpoena Rogers, the White House social secretary. While Democrats on the Homeland Security Committee seemed content to drill the Secret Service, Republicans were looking for a way to tie the breach to the Obamas. Thus the focus on Rogers, an Obama appointee.

(Lest we forget, the people who would be the targets of any genuine security threat are the president and the first lady. But if King could find a way to blame them for the breach, well, that's the way the game is played in Washington.)

King managed to make her absence a matter of great import, calling it "stonewalling, pure and simple." Is this really a scandal of such magnitude that stonewalling would be called for? Is this Gate-crasher-gate?

I don't know Rogers. I don't even know what a social secretary is supposed to do, so I can't say whether she properly discharged her duties. (My soirees tend to be a bit more casual; my invitations issued with an eye toward keeping chaos to a minimum: "Hey, I'm cooking collard greens and black-eyed peas, as usual, on New Year's Day. How many people are you bringing?")

I do know that the members of the alumni sorority of social secretaries have passed harsh judgment on her performance, denouncing her for playing the role of honored guest rather than worker bee. Instead of manning a gate with invitation list in hand, Rogers, a former corporate executive and Chicago socialite, made a dramatic entrance in a rumpled tablecloth, ah, evening dress, apparently designed for the daring.

Rogers may not have figured out exactly what a social secretary does, either, but it's pretty clear that her job description does not include protecting the president. That job falls squarely on the shoulders of the Service Service, whose officialdom has already taken responsibility, apologized and meted out discipline.

"This is our fault and our fault alone," Secret Service chief Mark Sullivan told Thompson's panel. He noted that three Secret Service agents are on administrative leave because of the Salahis' stunt, and they could lose their jobs.

Congress surely can bow out of the matter now and forget the subpoenas. Thompson and his team might find more useful work, like guarding the borders.

As for the Salahis, they are narcissistic twits who would enjoy being the targets of a congressional probe. Ignoring them would be the punishment they deserve.

(Cynthia Tucker can be reached at cynthia@ajc.com.)

Holocaust survivors blast Demjanjuk charade

MUNICH, Germany (AFP) โ€“
Holocaust survivors on Tuesday accused John Demjanjuk of faking the gravity of his illness to seek sympathy ahead of the first harrowing testimony on the killing of tens of thousands of Jews at the Sobibor death camp.

A lawyer for the alleged Nazi guard -- who faces charges of assisting in the gas chamber murder of 29,700 camp inmates -- in turn hit out at what he calls "double standards" in German justice by bringing action against a lowly soldier who did not give the orders.

Demjanjuk was pushed into his trial on Monday moaning in a wheelchair and later carried in on a stretcher. But at the end of the day he was seen laughing and joking.

Journalists and lawyers also witnessed an apparently much more active Demjanjuk outside the courtroom. Profile: John Demjanjuk

"I am sure he is faking his condition," said Thomas Blatt, an 82-year-old Sobibor survivor from the Netherlands camp who is to give testimony at Demjanjuk's trial.

"Yesterday the doctor said he was better now than he was in the United States," Blatt told reporters as he queued for Tuesday's hearing devoted to the formal reading of charges and the first testimony from survivors and relatives of those killed at the camp in occupied Poland.

The family of the 89-year-old Demjanjuk, who denies ever being at Sobibor, says he suffers from leukaemia and other illnesses and that he will probably not survive the trial in Munich.

"Given his now confirmed grave medical condition and his resulting inability to fully defend himself, it is farcical for anyone to say he is fit for trial and malpractice for any doctor to recommend it," his son John Demjanjuk junior said in a statement.

But Christoph Nerl, a specialist in blood diseases, told the court that Demjanjuk has a lesser complaint "which is definitely not leukaemia" and that Demjanjuk was "in a low-risk group."

Efraim Zuroff, head of the Nazi-hunting Simon Wiesenthal Centre in Jerusalem, said: "It's a pathetic attempt to appear more crippled than he is. He belongs in Hollywood."

"People like Demjanjuk don't deserve any sympathy because he had no sympathy for his victims," he said.

Demjanjuk is accused of helping to kill 27,900 people while a guard at Sobibor in 1943. Prosecutors say they have an SS identity card bearing his name and transfer orders.

Demjanjuk's defence lawyer Ulrich Busch argues that the case is a farce because German SS members -- Demjanjuk was born in Ukraine and was taken prisoner while in the Soviet Red Army -- were acquitted in earlier trials.

"How can it be that those who gave the orders can have been innocent?" he said, attacking what he called the German justice system's "double standards."

Some of the 30 or so plaintiffs in the case, either Sobibor survivors or who lost family members there, were to begin giving testimony on Tuesday.

There are no living eyewitnesses who can attest to seeing Demjanjuk there, so prosecutors will rely heavily on written testimony by people now dead, and accounts from survivors saying that as a guard, he had blood on his hands.

"The guards were all murderers," Robert Franzman, a Dutch plaintiff, told reporters on Monday.

Demjanjuk says he was captured in 1942 by the Germans and then moved around various prisoner-of-war camps, but Israeli and US courts have already established he was at Sobibor.

If convicted, Demjanjuk will almost certainly spend the rest of his days behind bars. If not, he will face an uncertain future as he is stateless, having been stripped of his US citizenship.

Demjanjuk was sentenced to death in Israel in 1988 for being "Ivan the Terrible", a sadistic Nazi guard, but after five years on death row the conviction was overturned when Israel established this was another man.

China says talks best way to solve Iran nuclear issue

BEIJING (Reuters) โ€“
Talks remain the best way to solve the Iran nuclear issue, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang said on Tuesday, after Iran announced plans to expand uranium enrichment in defiance of international pressure.

Iran announced plans on Sunday to build 10 new uranium enrichment plants in a big expansion of its atomic program, two days after the U.N. nuclear watchdog rebuked it for carrying out such work in secret.

Qin also urged all sides to "intensify diplomatic efforts seeking a resolution."

China "advocates resolution of the Iran nuclear issue through dialogue and negotiations," Qin added.

China supported the International Atomic Energy Agency's resolution, in a rare public show of anger at Iran, which supplies China with large quantities of oil.

(Reporting by Chris Buckley; editing by Ken Wills)